Thursday, 14 February 2013

Effects of by-catch


Effects of by-catch




Hall MA, Alverson DL, Metuzals KI. 2000. By-Catch: Problems and Solutions. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 41:204-219

Read AJ, Drinker P, Northridge S. 2005. By-catch of Marine Mammals in US and Global Fisheries. Conservation Biology. 20(1):163-169



The unintentional catching of many marine mammals is having profound effects on marine ecosystems around the world. A study done by Read and colleagues estimated the by-catch for 125 different marine mammal populations in three geographical US water regions (Atlantic-Gulf of Mexico, Pacific, and Alaska).  The data collected in this study was taken from observers which were placed on different fishing vessels from 1990-1999. They also used this data to estimate the total global marine mammal by-catch.

They found that the average annual by-catch of marine mammals in US waters was approximately 6,215 +/- 448. They used this information to estimate that approximately 653,365 marine mammals are accidentally captured a year globally. However, these numbers are only approximations as the major downfall to their methods is that they are using information from log books and observers. Many by-catch animals are assumed to not be reported by fishermen, or are grossly understated.
Though the current estimates of by-catch in the US and globally may seem unbelievable, this is actually a huge reduction in numbers. According to a study done by Hall et al. (2000) it was believed that in the 1960’s several hundreds of thousands of dolphins alone were caught while fishing for tuna. The major decrease in mortality rates was due to introduction of fishing acts and by-catch laws put in place (Hall et al. 2000). 


Some gear improvements has helped to reduce by-catch. Some fishermen use “pingers” which are electrical devices which deter many animals which use echolocation as their mode of sensing there environment. However, these methods are not as successful when it comes to other species of animals such as sea birds, turtles, and pinnipeds (Read et al. 2005). Thicker mesh, selective lines and baits are also some mechanisms put in place to avoid by-catch. But by far the most effective method of reducing by-catch is through public awareness and political policy placement (Hall et al. 2000). 



Though it is great to know that the annual by-catch numbers have decreased substantially over time, I still think there is room for improvement. It seems that a major problem with dealing with by-catch is the lack of knowledge and the low accountability of the data. Though fishers are required by law to record any by-catch, this is not always what happens. Having more programs with observers on board fishing vessels and also more research may help bring realistic numbers out into the open. With these numbers it will help drive further research and investigation into improving policies, fishing gear, and training of fishermen to help avoid by-catch.  


Word Count: 468